Northbank Civil & Marine v. Ed Boland Construction
Plaintiff: Northbank Civil & Marine, LLC
Defendant: Ed Boland Construction, INC
Case Number: 4:2015cv00038
Filed: May 6, 2015
Court: US District Court for the District of Montana
Office: Great Falls Office
County: CASCADE
Presiding Judge: Brian Morris
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 13, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 48 ORDER: IT IS ORDERED: 1) Northbank's 24 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on EBC's seventh defense, negligence of joint tortfeasors, is GRANTED and the defense is DISMISSED; 2) EBC's 31 Motion for a summary judgment order ruling Northbank has been unjustly enriched by obtaining drilling services from EBC without paying for the services is DENIED; 3) Northbanks 24 motion for summary judgment on EBCs counterclaim V, quantum meruit is DENIED; 4) Northbanks 27 motion in limi ne to exclude any allegations by EBC that Northbank had or breached a duty to amend its contract with EBC to a time and materials basis is DENIED; 5) Northbanks 27 motion in limine to limit EBCs damages for breach of contract, if any, to the $ 28,795 amended contract price for work performed, or, in the alternative, to the $37,765 amended Subcontract price is DENIED; 6) Northbanks 24 summary judgment motion on EBCs counterclaim VI, statutory right to payment, is DENIED; 7) EBCs 31 motion for a summary judgment order ruling that Northbank breached the contract by failing to pay EBC for mobilization, tooling, and drilling work is DENIED; 8. Northbanks 24 motion for summary judgment on EBCs third defense, waiver; EBCs counterc laim II, negligent misrepresentation; and EBCs counterclaim IV, fraud, is DENIED; 9) Northbanks 27 motion in limine to exclude evidence that Northbank allowed EBC on site without an approved drilling submittal is DENIED; 10) Northbanks 24 motion for summary judgment on EBCs ninth and tenth defenses is DENIED; 11) Northbanks 27 motion in limine to exclude any allegations or evidence that Northbank had or breached a duty to pursue a changed circumstances or differing site conditions request with the FHA is DENIED; 12) Northbanks 27 motion in limine to exclude evidence that Northbank did not fit steel pipe piles with a cutting or drive shoe for use with EBCs rock auger drilling system is DENIED. Signed by Judge Brian Morris on 10/13/2016. (SLR, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Montana District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Northbank Civil & Marine v. Ed Boland Construction
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Northbank Civil & Marine, LLC
Represented By: Bradford James Brown
Represented By: Jeffrey Russel Kuchel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ed Boland Construction, INC
Represented By: Michael L. Rausch
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?