ACE American Insurance Co., v. Vann et al
| ACE American Insurance Co., |
| Terra Vann, Cassie Faiai, Bobby Vann, Chase Vann, Tiffany St. Lawrence, Cody Vann, Camie Vann, Gayl Gregory, Troy Barnett, Ryen Barnett, Eva Gray, Linda Heidinger, State of Montana and Professional Transportation, Inc |
| 4:2017cv00091 |
| September 5, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Montana |
| Great Falls Office |
| ROOSEVELT |
| Brian Morris |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1335 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
226
ORDER: The Court conducted a hearing in this matter on August 8, 2019. The Court issued the following Orders on the following pending Motions: taking under advisement 118 Motion for Leave to File; taking under advisement 121 Motion for Disburse ment of Funds; taking under advisement 128 Motion to Amend/Correct; taking under advisement 161 Motion to Compel; taking under advisement 163 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 168 Motion in Limine; denying 170 Motion ; denying 172 Motion ; held in abayance 176 Motion to Bifurcate; granting 191 Motion in Limine; granting 196 Motion in Limine. Signed by Judge Brian Morris on 8/9/2019. (MMS)
|
|
Filing
203
ORDER denying 202 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice for failure to comply with Local Rule 7.1(c). Signed by Judge Brian Morris on 7/31/2019. (MMS)
|
|
Filing
192
ORDER granting 183 Motion to Attend Hearings by Telephone. Counsel Elizabeth W. Lund, may participate by telephone in the status conference and hearing on pending motions set in this matter for August 8, 2019, at 1:30 p.m. Counsel for Elizabeth W. Lund will call the Clerk of Court's office for details to appear at the August 8, 2019 motion hearing by telephone. Signed by Judge Brian Morris on 7/23/2019. (MMS)
|
|
Filing
187
ORDER FOR EXTENSION: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Vann and Gregory are granted an extension of time up to and including August 2, 2019 to file response briefs in opposition to Professional Transportation, Inc.'s recently filed motions. SEE ORDER FOR FULL DETAILS. Signed by Judge Brian Morris on 7/22/2019. (SLR)
|
|
Filing
132
ORDER WITHDRAWING ORDER 129 on Motion to Amend/Correct. On April 23, 2019, the Court inadvertently granted Plaintiff's Motion to Amend/Correct Answer Cross Claims 128 . Plaintiff failed to state in its motion whether the Defendants objected. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Court's Order 129 is WITHDRAWN. Plaintiff's motion will be ruled on after the briefing schedule has run. Signed by Judge Brian Morris on 4/23/2019. (MMS)
|
|
Filing
102
ORDER; 1. Plaintiff and Defendant Professional Transportation, Inc. pay $650,000 to the Clerk of Court of the United States District Court for the District of Montana, Great Falls Division; 2. The money be deposited with the Court Registry Inv estment System (CRIS); 3. The money be deposited in an interest bearing account; 4. That the Administrative Office of the United States Courts be able to deduct from the income earned on the investment a fee, not exceeding that authorized by the Judi cial Conference of the United States and set by the Director of the Administrative Office of the United States Courts, whenever such income becomes available for deduction and without further order of the Court; 5. That the tax identification number of the depositor be set forth under seal in a separate document. Signed by Judge Brian Morris on 1/14/2019. (TLO)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Montana District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
