Cotton v. BNSF Railway Company

Plaintiff: Joshua F Cotton
Defendant: BNSF Railway Company
Case Number: 4:2017cv00125
Filed: November 8, 2017
Court: Montana District Court
Office: Great Falls Office
County: CASCADE
Presiding Judge: Brian Morris
Nature of Suit: Other Labor Litigation
Cause of Action: 28:1441
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
April 17, 2018 19 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER granting 18 Motion for Leave to Appear Telephonically. Parties may telephonically attend the preliminary pretrial conference currently scheduled for May 3, 2018 at 11:00 a.m. in the Great Falls Division. The Court will contact the parties with the call in number. Signed by Judge Brian Morris on 4/17/2018. (MMS)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Montana District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cotton v. BNSF Railway Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joshua F Cotton
Represented By: Jeff R. Dingwall
Represented By: Michael P. Sand
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: BNSF Railway Company
Represented By: Michelle T. Friend
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?