Hendrick et al v. City of Valier et al
Daniel Hendrick and Robert Hames |
Valier Zoning Board, City of Valier, Troy Vandenbos, Dave Widhalm, John Doe, Louis DeBoo, Valier Town Council, Raymon D. Bukoveckas, Steve Nelson, Glenn Wunderlich, Leo Malinak and Conrad Knipschild |
4:2019cv00058 |
August 23, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Montana |
Brian Morris |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 30, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 ANSWER to #3 Complaint by Raymon D. Bukoveckas, City of Valier, Louis DeBoo, Conrad Knipschild, Leo Malinak, Steve Nelson, Valier Town Council, Valier Zoning Board, Troy Vandenbos, Dave Widhalm, Glenn Wunderlich. (Meek, Kevin) |
Filing 3 COMPLAINT and JURY DEMAND (State Court) against All Defendants, filed by Daniel Hendrick, Robert Hames. (ACC) |
Filing 2 NOTICE re #1 Notice of Removal from Montana Ninth Judicial District Court, Pondera County. (Attachments: #1 Removal Documents, #2 State Court Docket) (ACC) |
Remark: Original State Court documents placed in brown expando file on shelf in Clerk's Office. (ACC) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by All Defendants from Montana Ninth Judicial District Court, Pondera County, Case Number DV-19-11. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet) (SLR) |
Filing fee: $ 400, receipt number 0977-2357167. (SLR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Montana District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.