Roehl v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation et al
Heather Roehl |
National Railroad Passenger Corporation and Burlington Northern Santa Fe, LLC |
4:2024cv00068 |
August 8, 2024 |
U.S. District Court for the District of Montana |
John Johnston |
Federal Employer's Liability |
45 U.S.C. ยง 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 3, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 NOTICE of Acknowledgment of Pro Hac Vice Order by Heather Roehl re #4 Order on Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice, (Dreesen, Duane) |
Terminate Deadlines as to #4 Acknowledgment of Pro Hac; filed 9/9/24. (ACC) |
![]() |
Filing 3 MOTION D. Matthew Dreesen to Appear Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee $ 273 receipt number AMTDC-3317565.). James T. Towe appearing for Plaintiff Heather Roehl. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order) (Towe, James) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Burlington Northern Santa Fe, LLC, National Railroad Passenger Corporation. Issued summons may be downloaded and printed by counsel for service. (Attachments: #1 Issued Summons - BNSF) (ACC) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT and JURY DEMAND against Burlington Northern Santa Fe, LLC, National Railroad Passenger Corporation, filed by Heather Roehl. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons - National Railroad Passenger Corp, #3 Proposed Summons - BNSF) (ACC) |
Filing fee: $ 405.00, receipt number AMTDC-3308756 (ACC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Montana District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.