Cameron v. Rantz et al
| William Cameron |
| Elizabeth Rantz, Mike Mahoney, Mike Ferriter, Cathy Redfern, Ramakrishna, Evans, Bill Slaughter, Kohutt, Medical Staff, John and Jane Doe, Cathy, Roseanne, Schaffer, Matt Maxwell and Myron Beeson |
| 6:2008cv00042 |
| July 9, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of Montana |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights Office |
| POWELL |
| Donald W. Molloy |
| Keith Strong |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
126
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 121 in full. Defendant's motion for summary judgment 98 is GRANTED. Any appeal of this decision would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Donald W. Molloy on 6/16/2010. Mailed to Cameron. (TAG, )
|
|
Filing
112
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 106 in full. Plaintiff's 93 Motion for TRO and Preliminary Injunction is DENIED. Signed by Judge Donald W. Molloy on 1/5/2010. Copy mailed to Cameron. (TAG, )
|
|
Filing
106
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 93 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction filed by William Cameron. Plaintiffs Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Motion for Preliminary Injunction should be DENIED. Objections to F&R due by 12/21/2009. Signed by Magistrate Keith Strong on 12/4/2009. Copy mailed to Cameron. (TAG, )
|
|
Filing
70
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 59 in full. Defendants Dr. Ramakrishna, Bill Slaughter, MSP Medical Staff, and John and Jane Does are DISMISSED without prejudice. 55 Motion to Dismiss filed by William Cameron is GRANTED. Defendant Mann is dismissed. Defendants' 41 Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED. Signed by Judge Donald W. Molloy on 7/30/2009. Copy mailed to Cameron. (TAG, )
|
|
Filing
59
ORDER: DOC Defendants Motion for Sanctions 52 is DENIED; Plaintiff shall show cause, on or before August 6, 2009, why Dr. Schoenig should not be dismissed from this lawsuit. Plaintiffs Motion for Court Intervention 58 is DENIED and FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 55 MOTION to Dismiss filed by William Cameron, 41 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by DOC Defendants.' Recommendations: Defendants Dr. Ramakrishna, Bill Slaughter, MSP Medical Staff, and John and Jane Does should be DISMI SSED without prejudice; Plaintiffs Motion to Dismiss Defendants 55 should be GRANTED; DOC Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment 41 should be DENIED. Objections to F&R due by 7/27/2009. Signed by Magistrate Keith Strong on 7/10/2009. Copy mailed to Cameron. (ASG, )
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 11 in full. Plaintiff's Motion for TRO and for Preliminary Injunction 8 is DENIED. The claims against Defendant Maxwell are DISMISSED. Signed by Judge Donald W. Molloy on 12/4/2008. Copy mailed to Cameron (TAG, )
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER to serve defendants by requesting a waiver of service of summons and FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 7 Amended Complaint and 8 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction filed by William Cameron. (Objections to F&R d ue by 10/14/2008). Plaintiff's MOTION to Appoint Counsel is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Defendant Maxwell should be DISMISSED. Plaintiff's Motion for TRO and Preliminary Injunction should be DENIED.Signed by Magistrate Keith Strong on 9/25/2008. Copy mailed to Cameron. (TAG, ) Modified on 9/26/2008 to add extra description of document.(ASG, ).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Montana District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
