Dunsmore v. Mahoney et al

Dunsmore v. Mahoney et al

Petitioner:	Michael Dunsmore
Respondent:	Mike Mahoney and Attorney General of the State of Montana
Case Number:	6:2008cv00071
Filed:	September 30, 2008
Court:	US District Court for the District of Montana
Office:	Habeas Corpus (General) Office
County:	POWELL
Presiding Judge:	Donald W. Molloy
Presiding Judge:	Keith Strong
Nature of Suit:	None
Cause of Action:	Federal Question
Jury Demanded By:	28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
November 17, 2008	Filing 7 ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 5 in full. Dunsmore's Petition is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to exhaust state remedies. A certificate of appealabiliy is DENIED. Signed by Judge Donald W. Molloy on 11/17/2008. Copy mailed to Dunsmore. (TAG, )
October 20, 2008	Filing 5 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Michael Dunsmore. The Petition sould be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to exhuast administrative remedies. All pending motions [2,3] should be denied as MOOT. T he Clerk should enter a judgment of dismissal, and a certificated of appealability should be DENIED. Objections to F&R due by 11/6/2008. Signed by Magistrate Keith Strong on 10/20/2008. Mailed to Dunsmore. (TAG, ) Modified on 10/20/2008 to reflect that Dunsmore's copy was mailed to CCC per Notcie of Change of Address filed today. (ASG, ).

Date Filed

Document Text

November 17, 2008

Filing 7 ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 5 in full. Dunsmore's Petition is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to exhaust state remedies. A certificate of appealabiliy is DENIED. Signed by Judge Donald W. Molloy on 11/17/2008. Copy mailed to Dunsmore. (TAG, )

October 20, 2008

Filing 5 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Michael Dunsmore. The Petition sould be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to exhuast administrative remedies. All pending motions [2,3] should be denied as MOOT. T he Clerk should enter a judgment of dismissal, and a certificated of appealability should be DENIED. Objections to F&R due by 11/6/2008. Signed by Magistrate Keith Strong on 10/20/2008. Mailed to Dunsmore. (TAG, ) Modified on 10/20/2008 to reflect that Dunsmore's copy was mailed to CCC per Notcie of Change of Address filed today. (ASG, ).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Montana District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dunsmore v. Mahoney et al
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Michael Dunsmore
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Mike Mahoney
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Attorney General of the State of Montana
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?