Smith v. State of Montana et al
| Benjamin Karl Smith |
| State of Montana, Montana State Prison, Department of Corrections, Leroy Kirkegard, Sgt. Postma, David August (Bogut) and Scott Clark |
| 6:2014cv00062 |
| September 22, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of Montana |
| Helena Office |
| POWELL |
| Dana L. Christensen |
| Keith Strong |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
70
ORDER denying 68 Motion to Comply. Signed by Magistrate Judge John Johnston on 10/7/2016. Mailed to Smith. (TAG, )
|
|
Filing
67
ORDER ADOPTING 65 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS in full; denying 35 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 37 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 39 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 41 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Dana L. Christensen on 8/11/2016. Mailed to Smith. (TAG, )
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER denying without prejudice 14 Motion for Protection as construed as a Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction. Signed by Judge Dana L. Christensen on 4/30/2015. Mailed to Smith. (TAG, )
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 8 in full. Defendants State of Montana, Montana State Prison, and Montana Department of Corrections areDISMISSED. Signed by Judge Dana L. Christensen on 4/23/2015. Mailed to Smith. (TAG, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Montana District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
