Benson v. McCulloch et al
| Robin Benson |
| Linda McCulloch, Jonathan Motl and Timothy Fox |
| 6:2016cv00097 |
| October 18, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of Montana |
| Helena Office |
| LINCOLN |
| Susan P. Watters |
| Constitutionality of State Statutes |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
33
ORDER DISMISSING CASE without prejudice, with each party to bear their own costs and attorney's fees. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that any pending motions are DENIED as moot. Signed by Judge Susan P. Watters on 5/22/2017. (NOS)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER: Pursuant to Rule 65(a)(2), the Court hereby issues notice that it is consolidating Benson's Motion for a Preliminary Injunction with a hearing on the merits of Benson's request for a permanent injunction. The Parties have five days from the date of this Order to object. If neither party objects, the Court will issue an order setting a date for a hearing on the merits. Signed by Judge Susan P. Watters on 4/10/2017. (HEG)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION AND EXTEND FILING DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANT'S RESPONSE BRIEF. Responses due by 3/20/2017. Granting 14 MOTION for Leave to File MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply filed by Robin Benson. Signed by Judge Susan P. Watters on 2/28/2017. (AMC)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Montana District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
