Cantrell v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Ken Cantrell
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number: 6:2020cv00073
Filed: October 13, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of Montana
Presiding Judge: Charles C Lovell
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 205
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 20, 2020 Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Ken Cantrell. Social Security Administration General Counsel served on 10/30/2020, answer due 12/29/2020. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1. Return Receipts) (Bam, Maren)
November 19, 2020 Filing 8 Letter from Clerk of Court, Tyler P. Gilman regarding the CM/ECF registration requirements. Copy emailed to PHV counsel. (HEG)
November 19, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER granting #6 Motion for Maren Miller Bam to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Copy of order emailed to PHV counsel. Signed by Judge Charles C. Lovell on 11/19/2020. (HEG)
November 19, 2020 Remark: PHV counsel Maren Miller Bam in now a registered E-filer and will receive electronic notifications. (HEG)
November 17, 2020 Filing 6 MOTION Maren Miller Bam to Appear Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee $ 255 receipt number 0977-2574739.) Dale R. Robbins appearing for Plaintiff Ken Cantrell (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Exhibit) (Robbins, Dale)
November 12, 2020 Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Ryan Ta Lu on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security (Lu, Ryan)
October 15, 2020 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to U.S. Attorney General, Commissioner of Social Security and U.S. Attorney. Original summonses emailed to counsel for service. (Attachments: #1 Social Security Administration Summons, #2 U.S. Attorney Summons) (HEG)
October 15, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER granting #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall remove the word "lodged" from the docket entry for the complaint (Doc. 2), which is deemed filed October 13, 2020. Plaintiff is responsible for effecting service of process. Signed by Judge Charles C. Lovell on 10/15/2020. (HEG)
October 13, 2020 Filing 2 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security, filed by Ken Cantrell. (Attachments: #1 US Attorney General Summons, #2 Social Security Administration Summons, #3 United States Attorney Summons, #4 Civil Cover Sheet) (HEG) Modified on 10/15/2020 to remove LODGED text as complaint deemed filed (HEG).
October 13, 2020 Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis Dale R. Robbins appearing for Plaintiff Ken Cantrell (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order) (HEG)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Montana District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cantrell v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ken Cantrell
Represented By: Dale R. Robbins
Represented By: Maren Miller Bam
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By: Victoria L. Francis
Represented By: Ryan Ta Lu
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?