Miller v. Winner et al
| John O. Miller |
| Connie Winner, Cindy Hiner, Paul Reese, James Hurst, Melissa Scharf, Stephanie Pasha, Jessica Connell, Shanika Lister, Roey Pfisterer and Jim Salmonsen |
| 6:2021cv00055 |
| July 26, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Montana |
| Kathleen L DeSoto |
| Brian Morris |
| Prisoner Petitions (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 10, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER denying #1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Fee due within 14 days. If the clerk does not receive full and timely payment, the clerk shall close the case and enter, by separate document, a judgment of dismissal. Signed by Judge Brian Morris on 8/3/2021. Transmitted electronically to prison for delivery to Plaintiff. (TAG)
|
|
Filing fee: $ 402, receipt number MTX100018164 (TAG)
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE OF CASE OPENING re #2 Complaint IFP/Prisoner. Transmitted electronically to prison for delivery to Plaintiff. (TAG)
|
|
Filing 2
COMPLAINT IFP/PRISONER (32 pgs.) (Filing fee $ 402 not paid), filed by John O. Miller. (TAG) Modified on 8/3/2021: filing fee paid (TAG).
|
|
Filing 1
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (2 pgs.) by Plaintiff John O. Miller. Motions referred to Kathleen L. DeSoto. (Attachments: #1 Account Statement (11 pgs.)) (TAG)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Montana District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
