Fiechtner v. Kohl's Department Store

Plaintiff: Charles Adam Fiechtner, Sr
Defendant: Kohl's Department Store
Case Number: 9:2011cv00008
Filed: January 18, 2011
Court: Montana District Court
Office: Missoula Office
County: XX out of state
Referring Judge: Jeremiah C. Lynch
Presiding Judge: Donald W. Molloy
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 28:1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
March 25, 2011 6 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 4 in full. The Complaint 2 is DISMISSED, and the Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis 1 is DENIED as moot. Signed by Judge Donald W. Molloy on 3/25/2011. Mailed to Fiechtner. (TAG, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Montana District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Fiechtner v. Kohl's Department Store
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Charles Adam Fiechtner, Sr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kohl's Department Store
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.