Looman v. State of Montana et al
Plaintiff: Ronald Gary Looman
Defendant: International Union of Operating Engineers, Does 1-100, State of Montana and Montana Department of Corrections
Case Number: 9:2011cv00143
Filed: October 26, 2011
Court: US District Court for the District of Montana
Office: Missoula Office
County: DEER LODGE
Presiding Judge: Jeremiah C. Lynch
Presiding Judge: Donald W. Molloy
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 13, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 107 ORDER finding as moot 68 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 71 Motion for Summary Judgment; finding as moot 76 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; adopting Findings and Recommendations re 97 Findings and Recommendations. Signed by Judge Donald W. Molloy on 2/13/2013. (dle)
January 4, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 85 ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS. ; granting 64 Motion to Dismiss, Defendant, Liedle; adopting Findings and Recommendations re 67 Findings and Recommendations. Signed by Judge Donald W. Molloy on 1/4/2013. (CDH, )
October 24, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 62 ORDER ADOPTING 51 , 56 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS in full. Troy McQueary's 33 motion under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) is GRANTED. Ronald Looman's claims under 42 U.S.C. 1983 against McQueary are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJ UDICE. Looman's state law claims against McQueary are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. International Union of Operating Engineers National Training Fund's 28 motion under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) is GRANTED. Looman's claims under 42 U.S.C. 1983, strict liability, and the Montana Safety Act against the Union are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Donald W. Molloy on 10/24/2012. (TAG, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Montana District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Looman v. State of Montana et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: International Union of Operating Engineers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1-100
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: State of Montana
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Montana Department of Corrections
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ronald Gary Looman
Represented By: William V. Ballew, III
Represented By: Channing Hartelius
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?