Weaver v. State of Montana

Defendant: State of Montana
Plaintiff: William Larry Weaver
Case Number: 9:2012cv00069
Filed: April 26, 2012
Court: Montana District Court
Office: Missoula Office
County: MISSOULA
Presiding Judge: Dana L. Christensen
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
June 5, 2012 5 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 2 in full. 1 Complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; Weaver's Motion for appointment of counsel 4 is DENIED as moot. This dismissal counts as a strike pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(g), and any appeal of this decision would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Dana L. Christensen on 6/5/2012. Mailed to Weaver. (TAG, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Montana District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Weaver v. State of Montana
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: State of Montana
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: William Larry Weaver
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.