Defenders of Wildlife v. Jewell et al
Plaintiff: Defenders of Wildlife
Defendant: Sally Jewell and Daniel M. Ashe
Case Number: 9:2014cv00246
Filed: October 12, 2014
Court: US District Court for the District of Montana
Office: Missoula Office
County: MISSOULA
Presiding Judge: Dana L. Christensen
Nature of Suit: Review or Appeal of Agency Decision
Cause of Action: 16 U.S.C. ยง 1538
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 9, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 146 ORDER approving stipulations. Plaintiffs' Motion for Attorneys' Fees and Costs are DENIED as moot. The Court will retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the parties' stipulations. Signed by Judge Dana L. Christensen on 5/9/2017. Associated Cases: 9:14-cv-00246-DLC, 9:14-cv-00247-DLC, 9:14-cv-00250-DLC (ASG)
April 4, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 108 ORDER granting in part and denying in part (62) Motion for Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part (65) Motion for Summary Judgment; denying (72) Motion for Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part (75) Motion for Sum mary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part (78) Motion for Summary Judgment; denying (81) Motion for Summary Judgment in case 9:14-cv-00246-DLC; granting in part and denying in part (62) Motion for Summary Judgment; granting in part and d enying in part (65) Motion for Summary Judgment; denying (72) Motion for Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part (75) Motion for Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part (78) Motion for Summary Judgment; denying (81) Motion for Summary Judgment in case 9:14-cv-00247-DLC; granting in part and denying in part (65) Motion for Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part (68) Motion for Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part (78) Motion for Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part (81) Motion for Summary Judgment; denying (84) Motion for Summary Judgment in case 9:14-cv-00250-DLC; the United States Fish & Wildlife Service's Withdrawal of its Proposed Rule to lis t the distinct population segment of the NorthAmerican wolverine occurring in the contiguous United States as a threatened species under the Endangered Species Act, 79 Fed. Reg.47,522 (Aug. 13, 2014), is hereby VACATED - matter remanded to the United State Fish & Wildlife Service for further consideration consistent with this order. Signed by Judge Dana L. Christensen on 4/4/2016. Associated Cases: 9:14-cv-00246-DLC, 9:14-cv-00247-DLC, 9:14-cv-00250-DLC (CDH, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Montana District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Defenders of Wildlife v. Jewell et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Defenders of Wildlife
Represented By: Summer Lisa Nelson
Represented By: Michael Senatore
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sally Jewell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Daniel M. Ashe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?