Gragert v. Colvin
Plaintiff: James P. Gragert
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Case Number: 9:2015cv00118
Filed: September 15, 2015
Court: US District Court for the District of Montana
Office: Missoula Office
County: LINCOLN
Presiding Judge: Dana L. Christensen
Presiding Judge: Jeremiah C. Lynch
Nature of Suit: Supplemental Security Income
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 17, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER NUNC PRO TUNC ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS. This case is DISMISSED. Signed by Judge Dana L. Christensen on 10/17/2016. (NOS, )
October 14, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS. This case is DISMISSED. Signed by Judge Dana L. Christensen on 10/14/2016. (NOS, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Montana District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gragert v. Colvin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: James P. Gragert
Represented By: Michael A. Bliven
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?