In Re Porter
Plaintiff: Joseph Porter
Case Number: 9:2016cv00128
Filed: September 28, 2016
Court: US District Court for the District of Montana
Office: Missoula Office
County: MISSOULA
Presiding Judge: Dana L. Christensen
Presiding Judge: Jeremiah C. Lynch
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 31, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 3 in full. This case is DISMISSED. Signed by Judge Dana L. Christensen on 10/31/2016. Mailed to Porter. (TAG, )
September 30, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER granting 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Joseph Porter, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 2 Complaint IFP/Prisoner filed by Joseph Porter. (), Motions terminated: 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Joseph Porter. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremiah C. Lynch on 9/30/2016. (TCL, ) Modified on 9/30/2016: mailed to Porter (TAG, ).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Montana District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: In Re Porter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joseph Porter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?