Wrightson v. DoubleTree DTWC LLC
Plaintiff: Jess H. Wrightson
Defendant: DoubleTree DTWC LLC
Case Number: 9:2017cv00107
Filed: August 8, 2017
Court: US District Court for the District of Montana
Office: Missoula Office
County: RAVALLI
Presiding Judge: Donald W. Molloy
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 28:1332
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 12, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Dana L. Christensen on 10/12/2018. (ASG)
September 14, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER denying as moot 3 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Signed by Judge Donald W. Molloy on 9/14/2017. (dle)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Montana District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wrightson v. DoubleTree DTWC LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jess H. Wrightson
Represented By: Torrance Lee Coburn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DoubleTree DTWC LLC
Represented By: Veronica T. von Grabow
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?