Weimer v. Google Inc. et al
Anthony Weimer |
Google Inc., Microsoft Corporation, Federal Communication Commission and U.S. Department of Justice |
9:2018cv00078 |
April 26, 2018 |
US District Court for the District of Montana |
Missoula Office |
FLATHEAD |
Dana L. Christensen |
Jeremiah C. Lynch |
Other Personal Injury |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 58 ORDER that, effective December 12, 2018, the Clerk of Court shall not accept any filings that do not relate directly to Weimer's ability to appeal from the final entry of judgment in this matter. Signed by Judge Dana L. Christensen on 12/18/2018. (APP) |
Filing 57 ORDER that Weimer' s latest motion (Doc. 56) is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court will not consider any further filings-including any additional motions for reconsideration-in this action unless they relate to Weimer's ability to appeal the Court's decision. Signed by Judge Dana L. Christensen on 12/12/2018. (APP) |
Filing 55 ORDER denying 53 Rule 60 Motion. Signed by Judge Dana L. Christensen on 11/29/2018. (NOS) |
Filing 51 ORDER ADOPTING 43 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS in full; granting 12 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction; granting 16 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; granting 28 Motion to Dismiss; denying 32 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Dana L. Christensen on 10/24/2018. (TAG) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Montana District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.