Duram v. Big Sky Family Medicine et al
Daniel M. Duram |
Big Sky Family Medicine and Jonathon Anderson |
9:2019cv00033 |
February 14, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Montana |
Dana L Christensen |
Jeremiah C Lynch |
Personal Inj. Med. Malpractice |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1402 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 ORDER this action is DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i). Signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremiah C. Lynch on 3/12/2019. (APP) Copy mailed to Duram |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Dismissal by Daniel M. Duram (APP) |
Filing 4 ORDER granting #1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Daniel M. Duram. Motions terminated: #1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Daniel M. Duram. Order Setting: ( Amended Pleadings due by 3/21/2019.) Signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremiah C. Lynch on 2/21/2019. (TCL) Modified on 2/21/2019: mailed to Duram (TAG). |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF CASE OPENING re #2 Complaint IFP/Prisoner. Mailed to Duram with docket sheet (Attachments: #1 NOTICE TO PRO SE LITIGANTS AND CONSENT TO ELECTRONIC SERVICE, #2 PRO SE REQUEST TO FILE BY EMAIL) (TAG) |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT IFP/PRISONER (Filing fee $ 400 not paid), filed by Daniel M. Duram. (TAG) Modified on 2/21/2019: complaint deemed filed (TAG). |
Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Daniel M. Duram. Motions referred to Jeremiah C. Lynch. (TAG) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Montana District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.