Kramer et al v. Cequent Consumer Products, et al
| Robert Kramer and Jayne Kramer |
| Cequent Consumer Products, Highland Group, Briggs and Stratton and Murray |
| 4:2008cv03020 |
| February 1, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| 4 Lincoln Office |
| Platte |
| Richard G. Kopf |
| David L. Piester |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
12
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - On or before October 17, 2008, the plaintiffs shall either file a notice of dismissal with respect to the non-appearing defendants, Briggs & Stratton and Murray, Inc., or else a statement that they intend to prosecute the actio n against these defendants. If the plaintiffs intend to prosecute the action against the non-appearing defendants, they shall also file a return of service for each defendant no later than November 3, 2008. The court will withhold entry of judgment o n the joint stipulation (filing 11 ) until after the plaintiffs have filed the notice or statement required by paragraph 1 above, or until after the time allowed for such filing has expired. If no filing is made by the plaintiffs within the time allowed, the joint stipulation for dismissal with prejudice will be construed to apply only to the two defendants that signed the document, Cequent Consumer Products, Inc., and Highland Group, Inc.Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (GJG, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
