Brown v. ABM Industries et al
Plaintiff: Betty J Brown
Defendant: ABM Industries, ABM Security Services, Security Services of America, SSA Security, Silverhawk Security Specialists, Inc., Lavern Thomason, Roger Benson and Brenda Thompas
Case Number: 4:2008cv03233
Filed: November 21, 2008
Court: US District Court for the District of Nebraska
Office: Civil Rights: Jobs Office
County: Hall
Presiding Judge: David L. Piester
Presiding Judge:
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 28:1331 Fed. Question

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 11, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 43 JUDGMENT - Pursuant to the joint stipulation for dismissal with prejudice (filing 42 ) filed by remaining defendants SSA Security, Inc., d/b/a Silverhawk Security and Lavern Thomsen; the court's prior order dismissing defendants ABM Industries, Inc., ABM Security Services, Inc., Security Services of America, L.L.C., and Silverhawk Security Specialists, Inc., without prejudice (filing 31 ); the court's prior order dismissing defendants Brenda Thompas pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m) a nd for want of prosecution and defendant Roger Benson for want of prosecution (filing 37 ); and Fed. R. Civ. P. 41, IT IS ORDERED that the above-captioned case is dismissed in its entirety, with each party to bear their own costs. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (JAB)
October 29, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 40 SETTLEMENT ORDER. The court has been advised that the parties in the above-captioned matter have reached a settlement of their claims. Accordingly,IT IS ORDERED that:(1)Within sixty (60) calendar days of the date of this order, the parties shall fi le a joint stipulation for dismissal (or other dispositive stipulation) with the clerk of the court (and provide a copy to the magistrate judge and to United States District Judge Richard G. Kopf, the trial judge to whom this case is assigned), toget her with submitting to the trial judge a draft order which will fully dispose of the case;(2)Absent compliance with this order, this case (including all counterclaims and the like) may be dismissed without further notice;(3)This case is removed from the court's July 26, 2010 trial docket upon representation by the parties that the case has settled. ***Set Dismissal Papers Deadline -- due by 12/28/2009.Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (KLL, )
July 17, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 37 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER regarding Memorandum and Order 36 . The plaintiff was given until July 16, 2009 to show cause why her claims against Brenda Thompas and Roger Benson should not be dismissed. The plaintiff has failed to respond. Accordingly, Plain tiff's claims against Brenda Thompas are dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m) and for want of prosecution. Plaintiff's claims against Roger Benson are dismissed for want of prosecution. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (JAB)
July 6, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 36 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Plaintiff is given until July 16, 2009 to show cause why her claims against Brenda Thompas should not be dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m) or for want of prosecution, in the absence of which plaintiff&# 039;s claims against this defendant will be dismissed without further notice. Plaintiff is given until July 16, 2009 to show cause why her claims against Roger Benson should not be dismissed for want of prosecution in the absence of which plaintiff's claims against this defendant will be dismissed without further notice.( Show Cause Deadline set for 7/16/2009.) Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (GJG)
July 1, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 35 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - With the agreement of Judge Piester, the Chief Judge and the other district judges, Judge Kopf has begun handling all magistrate matters previously handled by Judge Piester. As to those cases listed, unless a party files a moti on to request a telephonic planning conference on or before July 10, 2009, no planning conference will be held to discuss the scheduling of the case to trial, and a final progression order will be entered based on the representations set forth in the parties' Rule 26(f) Report. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (LKH)
March 24, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 31 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER regarding Stipulation 29 . Defendants ABM Industries, Inc., ABM Security Services, Inc., Security Services of America, L.L.C., and Silverhawk Security Specialists, Inc., are dismissed from this action without prejudice, complete record waived, with each party to pay their own court costs. Defendant SSA Security, Inc., d/b/a Silverhawk Security is the only proper corporate defendant in this case. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (JAB)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Brown v. ABM Industries et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Betty J Brown
Represented By: Daniel M. Placzek
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ABM Industries
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ABM Security Services
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Security Services of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SSA Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Silverhawk Security Specialists, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lavern Thomason
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Roger Benson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Brenda Thompas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?