Reising v. Nebraska Department of Correctional Services
Petitioner: Gregory C. Reising
Respondent: Nebraska Department of Correctional Services
Case Number: 4:2009cv03129
Filed: June 25, 2009
Court: US District Court for the District of Nebraska
Office: 4 Lincoln Office
County: Lancaster
Presiding Judge: Richard G. Kopf
Presiding Judge: Pro Se Docket
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None
RSS Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 4, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 66 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Petitioner's Motion for Leave to Appeal IFP (filing no. 61 ) is granted. Petitioner's Motion for Certificate of Appealability (filing no. 65 ) is denied without prejudice to reassertion before the Eighth Circuit. Petitioner's Motion for Continuance (filing no. 64 ) is denied as moot. The Clerk of the court shall provide the Court of Appeals a copy of this Memorandum and Order. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party and as directed)(TCL)
April 7, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 63 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Petitioner shall have until May 4, 2010, to file a Motion for Certificate of Appealability and Brief in support. In the event that Petitioner fails to file a Motion and Brief, as set forth in this Memorandum and Order, the cour t will deny the issuance of a Certificate of Appealability without further notice. The Clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management in this case with the following text: May 4, 2010: check for filing of Motion for Certificateof Appealability.Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(TCL )
March 18, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 58 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - The court deems this matter fully submitted. Petitioner's Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (filing no. 13 ) is denied in all respects and this action is dismissed with prejudice. A separate judgment will be entered in accordance with this Memorandum and Order. All pending motions are denied. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(JAB)
December 1, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 52 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 51 Petitioner's Motion for Reconsideration. The court has carefully reviewed the record and finds no good cause to reconsider its previous Memorandum and Order. The parties shall proceed as directed in the courts previous Memorandum and Order. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (JAB)
November 24, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 49 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Reising's Motion for Access to the Courts (filing no. 24 ), Motion to Continue (filing no. 29 ), Motion for Response (filing no. 41 ), Motion for Status (filing no. 42 ), and Motion to Withdraw Request for Extension (filing no. 43 ) are denied as moot. Reising's Motion for Discovery (filing no. 30 ), Motion to Amend Designation of State Court Records (filing no. 38 ), and Motion to Appoint Counsel (filing no. 35 ) are denied without prejudice to reasser tion. Reising's Motion for Additional State Court Records (filing no. 31 ) is granted, but only as provided herein. Respondent shall immediately send to Reising a complete copy of the following state court records: appellant's brief on di rect appeal (filing no. 15 -3, attach. 2); appellant's brief in the postconviction action (filing no. 25 -5, attach. 4); and appellant's reply brief in the postconviction action (filing no. 25 -7, attach. 6). Reising shall have until De cember 24, 2009, to file an Amended Brief in Response. The Clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this case using the following text: December 24, 2009: deadline for Petitioner to file Amended Brief in Response. R eising's Motion for Hearing to Determine Competency (filing no. 36 ) is denied. Respondent's Objection to Motion for Discovery (filing nos. 32 ) and Motion to Strike (filing no. 48 ) are denied without prejudice to reassertion. Respondent's Objection to Motion for Hearing (filing no. 39 ) is granted. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(GJG)
October 6, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 23 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - According to the progression order entered by this court on September 3, 2009, Respondent has until October 18, 2009, to file all state court records that are relevant to Petitioner's cognizable claims. Therefore, Petitioner's Motion for Discovery (filing no. 16 ) is denied. Respondent's Objection to Motion for Miscellaneous Relief (filing no. 19 ) is denied. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(JAB)
September 3, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 20 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER regarding: Amended Petition 13 filed by Gregory C. Reising. Upon initial review of the Amended Petition (filing no. 13 ), the court preliminarily determines that Petitioner's Claims One, Two, and Three are potentially cogn izable in federal court. The court determines that Claims Four and Five are not cognizable in a federal court habeas action and are therefore dismissed. By October 18, 2009, Respondent shall file a motion for summary judgment or state court records i n support of an answer. ***Pro Se Case Management Deadlines: October 18, 2009: deadline for Respondent to file state court records in support of answer or motion for summary judgment; November 17, 2009: check for respondent to file answer and separate brief. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copies mailed as directed and to pro se party)(JAB)
August 4, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 12 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Petitioner shall have until September 2, 2009, to file an Amended Petition. Petitioner's Amended Petition shall set forth all grounds included in his current Petition and his Motions to Amend, as well as any new grounds. F ailure to consolidate grounds into one document will result in abandonment of all grounds not included in his original Petition. The Clerk of court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this case using the following text: September 2, 2009: Deadline for Petitioner to file a consolidated Amended Petition. Petitioner's Motion to Appoint Counsel (filing no. 10 ) is denied without prejudice to reassertion. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(GJG)
July 14, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 6 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER regarding initial review of petition. Upon initial review of the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (filing no. 1 ), the court preliminarily determines that the following claims are potentially cognizable in federal court: Claim s One and Three. The court determines that Claim Two is not cognizable in a federal court habeas action and is therefore dismissed. Petitioner's request for the appointment of counsel (filing no. 1 at CM/ECF p. 8) is denied without prejudice t o reassertion. The Clerk of the court is directed to mail copies of this memorandum and order and the section 2254 petition to the respondent and the Nebraska Attorney General by regular first-class mail. By August 28, 2009, the respondent shall fil e a motion for summary judgment or state court records in support of an answer. ***Pro Se Case Management Deadlines: August 28, 2009: deadline for respondent to file state court records in support of answer or motion for summary judgment and check for respondent to file answer and separate brief. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copies mailed to pro se party and as directed)(LKH)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Reising v. Nebraska Department of Correctional Services
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Gregory C. Reising
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Nebraska Department of Correctional Services
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?