v. Astrue
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Case Number: 4:2009cv03137
Filed: July 4, 2009
Court: US District Court for the District of Nebraska
Office: 4 Lincoln Office
County: Adams
Presiding Judge: Joseph F. Bataillon
Presiding Judge:
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 18, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 21 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that the decision of the Commissioner is reversed. The Commissioner has not met his burden of showing that plaintiff engaged in substantial gainful activity from 1995 through 1998. As a result, plaintiff was entitled to all payments received between 1995 and 1998. A final judgment will be entered in this case in conjunction with this memorandum and order. Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (ADB, )
November 24, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER granting 15 the plaintiff's Motion to Extend time to file a brief. The plaintiff shall have until December 23, 2009. Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (MKR)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: v. Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Represented By: Thomas A. Wagoner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?