Oberhauser v. Michael J. Astrue
| Michael J. Astrue and Sabrin Marie Oberhauser |
| Office of General Counsel Social Security Administration |
| 4:2010cv03047 |
| March 15, 2010 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| 4 Lincoln Office |
| Lyle E. Strom |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 402 Social Security Benefits |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
24
ORDER AND JUDGMENT - Plaintiff's application for attorney's fees pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA) 21 is granted. Plaintiff is awarded attorney fees in the amount of $2,068.38 under EAJA and costs of $350.00 from the Judgment Fund administered by the Department of the Treasury. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (copy to financial) (KBJ)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER granting 16 the defendant's Motion to Extend time. Defendant shall have until November 27, 2010, to respond to plaintiff's brief. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (MKR)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER granting 14 Motion to Extend Time. Defendant shall have until October 27, 2010, to respond to plaintiff's brief. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (JAE)
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER that Plaintiff shall file a brief within thirty (30) days from the date of this order; Defendant shall respond within thirty (30) days thereafter. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (TCL )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
