Graves v. Nebraska Department of Corrections
| Nebraska Department of Corrections |
| Nebraska Attorney General |
| 4:2010cv03056 |
| March 30, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| 4 Lincoln Office |
| Pro Se Docket |
| Richard G. Kopf |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
5
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 4 the Petitioner's Notice of Voluntary Dismissal. This matter is dismissed without prejudice. A separate judgment will be entered in accordance with this Memorandum and Order. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(MKR)
|
|
Filing
3
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Petitioner is directed to correct the above-listed technical defect in the Petition on or before April 29, 2010. Failure to comply with this Memorandum and Order will result in dismissal of this matter without further notice. The Clerk of the court send to Petitioner the Form AO240, Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit. The Clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this matter with the following text: April 29, 2010: deadline to pay fee or file MIFP.***Pro Se Case Management Deadlines: ( Pro Se Case Management Deadline set for 4/29/2010d eadline to pay fee or file MIFP.) Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copies mailed as directed)(MKR)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
