Crisp v. Clark et al
| Harold Crisp |
| Harold Clark, Doctor, Frank Hopkins, Robert Houston, Madson, Nebraska Department of Correctional Services and Rine Sabatka |
| 4:2010cv03125 |
| June 29, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| 4 Lincoln Office |
| Pro Se Docket |
| Richard G. Kopf |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
8
STRICKEN - PROTECTIVE ORDER - The Motion for Protective Order 18 is granted in part and denied in part. Ordered by Magistrate Judge F.A. Gossett. (Copy mailed/e-mailed to pro se party)(KBJ) Modified on 5/16/2011 to strike as this entry is in the wrong case and pursuant to Stike Order 8 (KBJ).
|
|
Filing
6
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - This matter is dismissed without prejudice because Plaintiff failed to prosecute this matter diligently and failed to comply with this court's orders. A separate judgment will be entered in accordance with this Memorandum and Order. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(KBJ)
|
|
Filing
5
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that Plaintiff shall have until August 2, 2010, to show cause why this case should not be dismissed; The Clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this case with the following text: August 2, 2010: deadline for Plaintiff to show cause. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(ADB, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
