State of Nebraska v. Link
| State of Nebraska |
| Darrell Allen Link |
| B.J. Viterna, John and Jane Doe and Midge Clark |
| Darrell Allen Link |
| 4:2011cv03088 |
| June 9, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| 4 Lincoln Office |
| Pro Se Docket |
| Lyle E. Strom |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
10
MEMORANDUM OPINION - This matter will be dismissed without prejudice because defendant failed to prosecute this matter diligently and failed to comply with this Court's orders. A separate order will be entered in accordance with this memorandum opinion. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (AOA)
|
|
Filing
7
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Defendant is directed to correct the above-listed technical defect in the complaint on or before August 15, 2011. Failure to comply with this memorandum and order will result in dismissal of this matter without further notice. The clerk of the court is directed to send to defendant the Form AO240, Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit. ***Pro Se Case Management Deadlines: (Pro Se Case Management Deadline set for 8/15/2011: deadline for payment or filing of IFP application.) Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (Form AO240 mailed to pro se party as directed) (TEL)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
