Kislyak v. William Gibson
Petitioner: Pavel Kislyak
Respondent: William Gibson
Interested Party: Nebraska Attorney General
Case Number: 4:2012cv03025
Filed: February 8, 2012
Court: US District Court for the District of Nebraska
Office: 4 Lincoln Office
Presiding Judge: Laurie Smith Camp
Presiding Judge: Pro Se Docket
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 29, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 22 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER regarding: Notice of Appeal to USCA 19 filed by Pavel Kislyak. The Clerk of the court shall not process Petitioner's appeal; and The Clerk of the court is directed to forward a copy of this Memorandum and Order to the parties and to the Eighth Circuit Court of AppealsOrdered by Chief Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (Copies mailed as directed)(MKR)
December 13, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 21 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER -Petitioner shall have until January 10, 2013, to submit an affidavit to show excusable neglect or good cause for failing to file a timely notice of appeal. If Petitioner fails to submit such an affidavit by January 10, 2013, P etitioners appeal will not be processed. Petitioner shall have until January 10, 2013, to submit either the $455.00 appellate filing fee or a motion to proceed IFP, with the required affidavit. If Petitioner fails to submit the fee or a motion and affidavit, Petitioners appeal will not be processed. ***Pro Se Case Management Deadlines: Check for affidavit and filing fee on January 10, 2013. ( Pro Se Case Management Deadline set for 1/10/2013.) Ordered by Chief Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(MKR)
April 10, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 12 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Respondent's Motion to Substitute Party (Filing No. 10 ) is granted. The Clerk of the court is directed to update the court's records in accordance with the Motion to Substitute Party. Respondent's Motion for Extension of Time (Filing No. 11 ) is granted. Respondent shall file either a motion for summary judgment or state court records in support of an answer by May 10, 2012. Ordered by Chief Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(GJG)
February 28, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 8 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER-Upon initial review of the Petition (Filing No. 1 ), the court preliminarily decides that Claim One is potentially cognizable in federal court. Upon initial review of the Petition (Filing No. 1), the court decides that Claim Two is not a cognizable habeas corpus claim. Claim Two is dismissed without prejudice to the subsequent filing of an action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983; The Clerk of the court is directed to mail copies of this Memorandum and Order and the Pet ition (Filing No. 1 ) to Respondents and the Nebraska Attorney General by regular first-class mail. By April 9, 2012, Respondent shall file a motion for summary judgment or state court records in support of an answer. ***Pro Se Case Management Dea dlines: ( Pro Se Case Management Deadline set for 4/9/2012: deadline for Respondent to file state court records in support of answer or motion for summary judgment). No later than 30 days after the filing of Petitioners brief, Respondent shall fil e and serve a reply brief. In the event that Respondent elects not to file a reply brief, he should inform the court by filing a notice stating that he will not file a reply brief and that the merits of the petition are therefore fully submitted for decision. ( Pro Se Case Management Deadline set for: May 2, 2012: check for Respondent to file answer and separate brief. Ordered by Chief Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (Copy mailed as directed)(MKR)
February 23, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 7 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER provisionally granting 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Petitioner will not be required to pay the $5.00 fee at this time. Ordered by Chief Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (Copy mailed/e-mailed to pro se party)(MKR)
February 9, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 5 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - I recuse myself from this case. Until further notice, I recuse myself from all pro se habeas cases where a party challenges his or her custody by the State of Nebraska, any of its subdivisions or any agent, servant or employee of such entity. The Clerk shall take such action as is required to implement this order. Ordered by Judge John M. Gerrard. (Copy mailed/e-mailed to pro se party)(MKR, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kislyak v. William Gibson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: William Gibson
Represented By: Nathan A. Liss
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Pavel Kislyak
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: Nebraska Attorney General
Represented By: Jon C. Bruning
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?