Krivda v Sunrise Country, Inc, et al
| Ms. Debra J. Krivda |
| Charliss Marshall and Sunrise Country, Inc. |
| 4:2013cv03068 |
| March 28, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| 4 Lincoln Office |
| Richard G. Kopf |
| Cheryl R. Zwart |
| Negotiable Instrument |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 2601 Family Medical Leave Act |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
57
ORDER - Defendants' motion for extension of time 56 is granted, and the parties shall have an additional 30 days, until February 18, 2014, to file ajoint sitpulation for dismissal. ( Dismissal Papers Deadline due by 2/18/2014.) Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (MKR)
|
|
Filing
50
ORDER that the dispositive motion and deposition deadlines are set aside pending further order of the court. The plaintiff's motion for sanctions 33 , and the defendant's Motion for Protective Order 39 , are withdrawn. A settlement confer ence will be held before the undersigned magistrate judge with counsel and representatives of the parties on December 18, 2013, beginning at 9:00 a.m. in chambers, 566 Federal Building and United States Courthouse, 100 Centennial Mall North, Lincoln, Nebraska. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (JSF)
|
|
Filing
25
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER sustaining 22 Objection to the Subpoena Duces Tecum. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (JSF)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
