Lewis v. Houston et al
| Eric Fritzgerald Lewis |
| Robert P. Houston and Fred Britten |
| Nebraska Attorney General |
| 4:2013cv03092 |
| May 2, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| 4 Lincoln Office |
| Pro Se Docket |
| Richard G. Kopf |
| Habeas Corpus: General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
9
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: This matter is dismissed without prejudice, and a separate judgment will be entered in accordance with this Memorandum and Order. The court will not issue a certificate of appealability in this matter. The Clerk of the court is directed to send to Petitioner the Civil Complaint Form and the AO 240 Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(TCL)
|
|
Filing
8
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: The Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis (filing no. 2 ) is provisionally granted and Petitioner will not be required to pay the $5.00 fee at this time. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(TCL )
|
|
Filing
7
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: Petitioner's Motion to Reassign Case (Filing No. 6 ) is denied. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(TCL )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
