Coutts v. State of Nebraska
| James A. Coutts |
| State of Nebraska |
| Nebraska Attorney General |
| 4:2013cv03144 |
| August 12, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| 4 Lincoln Office |
| Laurie Smith Camp |
| Pro Se Docket |
| Habeas Corpus: General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
39
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 38 Motion to Withdraw Document. Coutts's Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus 24 is dismissed without prejudice. The Court will enter a separate Judgment in accordance with this Memorandum and Order and the Memorandum and Order dated June 18, 2014. (See Filing No. 34 (dismissing the claims raised in Coutts's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing No. 1 ) with prejudice).) Ordered by Chief Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (JSF)
|
|
Filing
35
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that upon initial review of the Amended Petition (Filing No. 24), the court preliminarily determines that Claims One and Three, as set forth in this Memorandum and Order, are potentially cognizable in federal court. By August 5 , 2014, Respondent shall file a motion for summary judgment or state court records in support of an answer. The Clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadlines in this case using the following text: August 5, 2014: deadline f or Respondent to file state court records in support of answer or motion for summary judgment; and the following text : September 2, 2014:check for Respondent to file answer and separate brief. Ordered by Chief Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (Copies mailed to pro se party and as directed)(ADB)
|
|
Filing
33
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 31 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Ordered by Chief Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (JSF)
|
|
Filing
14
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that upon initial review of the habeas corpus petition 1 , the court preliminarily determines that Petitioner's claims, as set forth in this Memorandum and Order, are potentially cognizable in federal court. The Clerk of th e court is directed to mail copies of this memorandum and order and the section 2254 petition to Respondent and the Nebraska Attorney General by regular first-class mail. By January 2, 2014, Respondent shall file a motion for summary judgment or stat e court records in support of an answer. The Clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this case using the following text: January 2, 2014: deadline for Respondent to file state court records in support of answer or motion for summary judgment. Ordered by Chief Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (JSF)
|
|
Filing
9
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that the Plaintiff shall have 30 days from the date of this Memorandum and Order to file an amended petition for writ of habeas corpus naming the current warden of Petitioner's place of confinement as the respondent. In the alternative, Plaintiff may file a motion to substitute party. The clerk's office is directed to set the following pro se case management deadline: December 9, 2013: Deadline for the petitioner to name proper respondent. Ordered by Chief Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(ADB)
|
|
Filing
7
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER provisionally granting 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Petitioner is relieved from paying the fee at this time. Ordered by Chief Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (JSF)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
