Nattress v. Lancaster County, Nebraska et al
Plaintiff: Ronald Nattress
Defendant: Scott Eisenman, Robert Holbrook, Lancaster County, Nebraska and Adam T. Powers
Case Number: 4:2014cv03161
Filed: August 12, 2014
Court: US District Court for the District of Nebraska
Office: 4 Lincoln Office
Presiding Judge: John M. Gerrard
Presiding Judge: Cheryl R. Zwart
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 15, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 45 ORDER - The court has been advised that, upon thorough consideration of the court's ruling on summary judgment, the defendants intend to file an interlocutory appeal of the court's ruling on the issue of qualified immunity. Accordingly, that this case is removed from Judge Gerrard's trial docket pending further order of the court. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (JAB)
July 13, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 43 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - The plaintiff's motion for summary judgment (filing 20 ) is denied. The defendants' motion for summary judgment (filing 22 is granted in part. The plaintiff's first and third claims for relief are dismissed without prejudice. The plaintiff's second claim for relief is dismissed as to the County. The plaintiff's second claim for relief is dismissed as to defendants Powers, Holbrook, and Eisenmann in their official capacities. The balance of the defendants' motion for summary judgment (filing 22 ) is denied. Ordered by Judge John M. Gerrard. (GJG)
June 24, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 40 ORDER - The motion to substitute Ryan M. Swaroff for Richard C. Grabow as counsel for Defendants, Lancaster County Nebraska; Adam T. Powers; Robert Holbrook; and Scott Eisenmann, (filing no. 39 ), is granted. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (JAB)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Nattress v. Lancaster County, Nebraska et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Scott Eisenman
Represented By: Richard C. Grabow
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Robert Holbrook
Represented By: Richard C. Grabow
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lancaster County, Nebraska
Represented By: Richard C. Grabow
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Adam T. Powers
Represented By: Richard C. Grabow
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ronald Nattress
Represented By: Joy A. Shiffermiller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?