Sears et al v. Sears et al
||Korley B. Sears and Robert A. Sears
||Rhett R. Sears Revocable Trust, Ron H. Sears Trust, Dane R. Sears, Rhett R. Sears and Ronald H. Sears
||U.S. Bankruptcy Court
||December 24, 2014
||US District Court for the District of Nebraska
||4 Lincoln Office
||Richard G. Kopf
|Nature of Suit:
||Bankruptcy Appeal (801)
|Cause of Action:
||28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BA
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|September 28, 2015
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Appellants' motion to supplement the record on appeal (Filing No. 13 ) is granted instanter, and the court takes judicial notice of the documents attached to such motion. The order entered by the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Nebraska on December 9, 2014, remanding the adversary proceeding to the District Court of Madison County, Nebraska, is reversed, and the case is remanded to the bankruptcy court for further proceedings. Judgment shall be entered by separate document. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (LAC)
|December 24, 2014
TEXT ORDER Mooting Motion to Dismiss Adversary Proceeding filed by Defendants (Related Doc #4), Mooting Motion For Sanctions filed by Defendant (Related Doc #6), Mooting Motion To Consolidate filed by Defendants (Related Doc #9), Mooting Motion for Order that Statement Under Rule 9027(e) Filed One Day Late has Same Effect as if Timely Filed filed by Plaintiff (Related Doc #14). Motions are moot. See written opinion entered this day. Ordered by Chief Judge Thomas L. Saladino. (JAB)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?