Roe v. State of Nebraska et al
| Henry Roe |
| John and Jane Doe(s) 1 through 10 and State of Nebraska |
| 4:2015cv03071 |
| July 8, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| 4 Lincoln Office |
| Lyle E. Strom |
| F.A. Gossett |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
19
ORDER AND JUDGMENT - Defendants' motion to dismiss is granted. Plaintiff's first cause of action is dismissed with prejudice as to the State of Nebraska and John and Jane Doe(s) 1 through 10 in their official capacities, and without pr ejudice as to John and Jane Doe(s) 1 through 10 in their individual capacities. Plaintiff's second and third causes of action are dismissed without prejudice. Plaintiff's fourth cause of action is dismissed with prejudice as to the State of Nebraska and John and Jane Doe(s) 1 through 10 in their official capacities and without prejudice as to John and Jane Doe(s) 1 through 10 in their individual capacities. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (GJG)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER - Plaintiff's motion 14 is granted. Plaintiff shall have until September 30, 2015, to respond to defendants' motion to dismiss. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (GJG)
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER - Defendants' motion 8 is granted. The index of evidence shall remain sealed pending further order of the Court. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (GJG)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
