Casteel v. City of Crete
| Jay F. Casteel |
| City of Crete |
| 4:2016cv03166 |
| October 26, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| 4 Lincoln Office |
| Richard G. Kopf |
| Cheryl R. Zwart |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
76
ORDER granting 75 Motion to Continue. Jury Trial set for 10/21/2019 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 1, Robert V. Denney Federal Building, 100 Centennial Mall North, Lincoln, NE before Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. Pretrial Conference set for 10/2/2019 at 01:00 PM Internet/Telephonic Conferencing before Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (LAC)
|
|
Filing
54
ORDER that the summary judgment deadline is extended to January 11, 2019. The pretrial conference and jury trial are continued pending further order of the court. If this case is not fully resolved by summary judgment, within ten (10) days after the summary judgment ruling, the parties shall contact the undersigned magistrate judge's chambers to re-schedule the pretrial conference and trial. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (LAC)
|
|
Filing
45
PROGRESSION ORDER - that the initial progression order (Filing No. 26 ) is amended and supplemented as follows: Jury Trial set for 3/25/2019 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 1, Robert V. Denney Federal Building, 100 Centennial Mall North, Lincoln, NE before Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf., Pretrial Conference set for 3/12/2019 at 01:00 PM Internet/Telephonic Conferencing before Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart., Telephone Conference set for 12/4/2018 at 11:00 AM by Telephone before Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (LKO)
|
|
Filing
20
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that Defendant's motion to strike is granted in part and denied in part as follows: 1. Defendant's motion to strike Plaintiff's claim for compensatory damages for any alleged retaliation under the ADA (42 U.S. C. 12203) is granted. 2. Defendant's unopposed motion to strike Plaintiff's request for punitive damages is granted. 3. Defendant's motion to strike Plaintiff's jury demand is granted as to Plaintiff's claims under the NFEPA and Plaintiff's claim for retaliation under the ADA. The motion is denied with respect to Plaintiff's claims for discrimination under the ADA and for retaliation under Title VII. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (LAC)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Casteel v. City of Crete | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Jay F. Casteel | |
| Represented By: | Ari D. Riekes |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: City of Crete | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
