SouthLaw, PC v. Swanson, et al
| SouthLaw, PC |
| Nancy L. Black, Internal Revenue Service, Neerpark Inc. and Christine L. Swanson |
| 4:2017cv03104 |
| August 11, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| 4 Lincoln Office |
| John M. Gerrard |
| Cheryl R. Zwart |
| Taxes |
| Civil Miscellaneous Case |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
77
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER NUNC PRO TUNC: Defendant Black's claim of priority to the remaining $731.17 plus interest is dismissed with prejudice; Defendant Swanson is entitled to priority as to the remaining funds; The Clerk of Court shall pr epare a check on the funds deposited in the Court Registry in the amount of $731.17 in principal plus any accrued interest, made payable to Christine L. Swanson; Defendant Swanson is ordered to complete an Internal Revenue Service Form W-9 and submit it via e-mail to the Clerk of Court. Upon receipt of such Form W-9, the Clerk of Court shall mail said funds to Christine L. Swanson, PO Box 172, Waukee, Iowa 50263. The Court will enter a separate judgment. Ordered by Judge Brian C. Buescher. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (ADB)
|
|
Filing
75
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that Defendant Black's claim of priority to the remaining $731.17 plus interest is dismissed with prejudice. Defendant Swanson is entitled to priority as to the remaining funds. The Clerk of Court is ordered to distribute the remaining $731.17 plus any accrued interest to defendant Swanson. The Court will enter a separate judgment. Ordered by Judge Brian C. Buescher. (Copy mailed to pro se party and copy to Finance)(LAC)
|
|
Filing
71
ORDER that on or before October 31, 2019, each party shall deliver a copy of the exhibits they intend to use at trial to the Clerk's office of the federal court in Omaha, Nebraska. Upon receipt, the clerk's office shall promptly deliver the documents to Judge Buescher's chambers. The failure to timely attend the trial as scheduled will result in dismissal, with prejudice, of the non-attending party's claim to the $731.17 currently deposited with the court. If nei ther party timely attends the trial, the $731.17 will be divided in half, with equal amounts (to the extent possible) then distributed to each of Defendants Swanson and Black. This order shall be both mailed and emailed to Defendant Black at her mail and email addresses of record. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (Copy mailed and e-mailed to Defendant Black)(ADB)
|
|
Filing
70
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that Ms. Black's oral motion to recuse is denied. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (ADB)
|
|
Filing
63
ORDER that SouthLaw, PC has deposited the $731.17 that is the subject of the parties' remaining claims. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that SouthLaw, PC is dismissed as a party to this case. Ordered by Chief Judge John M. Gerrard. (ADB)
|
|
Filing
49
ORDER - After conferring with the parties, this matter will be submitted to the court for ruling as a matter of law as follows: 1) The Internal Revenue service shall file its motion for summary judgment on or before March 12, 2019. 2) Plaintiff, and Defendants Swanson and Neerpark shall file a statement of their positions on the IRS' motion on or before March 19, 2019. Defendant Black may also file such a statement on or before March 19, 2019. She may also file a separate motion for summary judgment with her requests as to the disposition of the money being held in trust by Plaintiff, such motion to be filed on or before April 2, 2019.3) As stated in the court's local rules, the summary judgment response deadline is 21 days after the motion is filed, with any reply filed seven days thereafter.Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (JAB) Modified on 2/12/2019 to reflect copy mailed to pro se party. (JAB)
|
|
Filing
45
ORDER - IT IS ORDERED: The telephone conference scheduled for January 10, 2019 at 9:00 a.m. is continued to a date and time yet to be determined. Counsel for the IRS/USA shall contact chambers by email addressed to zwart@ned.uscourts.gov with in 10 days following the restoration of funding for, and the operation of, the United States Department of Justice. The court will contact the parties to reschedule the telephone conference at that time. A copy of this order shall be mailed to Defendant, Nancy L. Black at her address of record. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (Copy mailed as directed)(TCL)
|
|
Filing
43
ORDER that Defendant Swanson's motion to stay this case pending the outcome of the Nebraska state court proceedings is granted. Beginning November 1, 2018, Defendant shall file a report on this court's docket which explains the status o f Swanson's state court action. Defendant Swanson shall file a status report on the first of the month every two months thereafter until the stay herein is lifted. The Clerk of the United States District Court for the District of Nebraska shall close this case for statistical purposes. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (ADB)
|
|
Filing
39
ORDER that the progression of this case is stayed pending further order of the court. The clerk shall set an August 15, 2018 to re-evaluate whether the case should be progressed. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(LAC)
|
|
Filing
32
ORDER that the plaintiff's motion (filing 28 ) is denied without prejudice to reassertion. Ordered by Judge John M. Gerrard. (LAC)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
