Graham v. State of Nebraska et al
||Kathleen M. Graham
||Nebraska Department of Administrative Services, Office of Governor and State of Nebraska
||June 21, 2018
||US District Court for the District of Nebraska
||4 Lincoln Office
||Joseph F. Bataillon
||Michael D. Nelson
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
||28:1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|December 18, 2018
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that Defendant's motion for partial summary judgment 16 is granted and the federal Age Discrimination in Employment Act claim is dismissed. The remainder of the case is remanded to the District Court of Lancaster County , Nebraska for further processing of the state law age discrimination claims. The clerk's office is directed to mail a certified copy of this order of remand to the clerk of the District Court of Lancaster County, Nebraska. The parties shall bear their own costs. A separate judgment will be entered. Ordered by Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (Certified copy mailed as directed)(MBM)
|July 11, 2018
ORDER TO DISMISS THE DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES WITHOUT PREJUDICE - THIS MATTER came before the Court upon the Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss without prejudice Defendant Department of Administrative Services. The Court finds said motion should be and hereby is sustained. Defendant Department of Administrative Services is hereby dismissed without prejudice as a party in the above captioned matter. Ordered by Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (TCL)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?