Longs v. Jacobsens et al
| Michael Longs, II |
| Kristin, Hon. Jacobsens, Hon. McManaman and Bradley L. Johnson |
| 4:2018cv03120 |
| August 29, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| Pro Se Docket |
| Richard G Kopf |
| Habeas Corpus: General |
| 28 U.S.C. § 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 6, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 21 SUPPLEMENT on behalf of Petitioner Michael Longs, II.(LAC) |
| Filing 20 SUPPLEMENT on behalf of Petitioner Michael Longs, II.(LAC) |
| Filing 19 SUPPLEMENT on behalf of Petitioner Michael Longs, II.(LAC) |
| Filing 18 SUPPLEMENT on behalf of Petitioner Michael Longs, II.(LAC) |
| Filing 17 SUPPLEMENT on behalf of Petitioner Michael Longs, II.(LAC) |
| Filing 16 SUPPLEMENT on behalf of Petitioner Michael Longs, II.(LAC) |
| Filing 15 SUPPLEMENT on behalf of Petitioner Michael Longs, II.(LAC) |
| Filing 14 MOTION for Amicus Curiae on behalf of Petitioner Michael Longs, II.(LAC) |
| Filing 13 MOTION on behalf of Petitioner Michael Longs, II.(LAC) |
| Filing 12 MOTION Misc Relief on behalf of Petitioner Michael Longs, II. (LAC) |
| Filing 11 SUPPLEMENT on behalf of Petitioner Michael Longs, II.(LAC) |
| Filing 10 SUPPLEMENT on behalf of Petitioner Michael Longs, II. (LAC) |
| Filing 9 SUPPLEMENT on behalf of Petitioner Michael Longs, II.(LAC) |
| Filing 8 AMENDED COMPLAINT against respondent Bradley L. Johnson Michael Longs, II. (LAC) |
| Filing 7 MOTION/PRECIPE TO TAKE JUDICIAL NOTICE FOR DISCHARGE OF CR17-1508 on behalf of Petitioner Michael Longs, II. (LAC) |
| Filing 6 SUPPLEMENT on behalf of Petitioner Michael Longs, II.(LAC) |
Filing 5
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that the pending Petition (filing no. #1 ; filing no. #4 ) is deemed insufficient and the court will not act upon it. Petitioner's Motion for Bond/Release (filing no. #3 ) is denied without prejudice to reassertion after Petitioner files an amended petition in accordance with this Memorandum and Order. By November 8, 2018, Petitioner shall file an amended petition for writ of habeas corpus that is originally signed under penalty of perjury and in which he names a proper respondent. Petitioner is encouraged to use the enclosed official Form AO242. To avoid confusion, any document Petitioner sends to the clerk of the court for filing in this case must clearly display the case number. Failure to file an amended petition in accordance with this Memorandum and Order will result in dismissal of this matter without further notice. The clerk of the court is directed to send to Petitioner the Form AO242 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Under 28 U.S.C. 2241. The clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this matter with the following text: November 8, 2018: Check for amended petition. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy and AO242 Form mailed to pro se party)(LAC)
|
| Filing 4 SUPPLEMENT on behalf of Petitioner Michael Longs, II. (LKO) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for bond/realese on behalf of Petitioner Michael Longs, II. (LKO) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE by Clerk acknowledging receipt of complaint filed by a pro se party. (LKO) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus with receipt number 4007357, in the amount of $5 filed by pro se petitioner Michael Longs, II. (LKO) |
| TEXT ENTRY THAT FILING fee paid on behalf of Michael Longs, II on 8/29/18. Receipt number 4007357, in the amount of $5. (LKO) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
