Bailey v. City of Bellevue, Nebraska
| Robert Bailey |
| City of Bellevue, Nebraska |
| 4:2018cv03132 |
| September 21, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| John M Gerrard |
| Michael D Nelson |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 7703 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 14, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
RESTRICTED CASE CONFERENCE INSTRUCTIONS. ACCESS TO THE PDF DOCUMENT IS RESTRICTED TO CASE PARTICIPANTS AND THE COURT PURSUANT TO THE E-GOVERNMENT ACT AND FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 5.2(a). Ordered by Magistrate Judge Michael D. Nelson. (KLF)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER FOR INITIAL PROGRESSION OF CASE - Counsel shall notify the undersigned magistrate judge by joint or separate letters by January 14, 2019 addressing mediation requirements. A telephone conference with the undersigned magistrate judge will be held on February 15, 2019, at 11:00 a.m., for the purpose of reviewing the preparation of the case to date and the scheduling of the case to trial. A separate order will be filed with conferencing instructions. Trial is tentatively set for the month of October 2019, and is tentatively scheduled for four (4) trial days. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Michael D. Nelson. (KLF)
|
| Filing 8 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting by Attorney Molly J. Miller on behalf of Defendant City of Bellevue, Nebraska.(Miller, Molly) |
|
Filing 7
SCHEDULING LETTER - Rule 26 Meeting Report Deadline set for 11/14/2018. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Michael D. Nelson. (KLF)
|
| Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint by City of Bellevue, Nebraska (Miller, Molly) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed upon Sabrina Ohnmacht, Clerk, for defendant City of Bellevue, Nebraska on 9/24/2018. (McCarty, Thomas) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to defendant City of Bellevue, Nebraska. YOU MUST PRINT YOUR ISSUED SUMMONS, WHICH ARE ATTACHED TO THIS DOCUMENT. PAPER COPIES WILL NOT BE MAILED. (LKO) |
| Filing 3 Summons Requested as to Defendant regarding Complaint #1 . (McCarty, Thomas) |
| Filing 2 TEXT NOTICE OF JUDGES ASSIGNED: Judge John M. Gerrard and Magistrate Judge Michael D. Nelson assigned. (LKO) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand ed against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number ANEDC-3769433), by Attorney Thomas P. McCarty on behalf of Robert Bailey(McCarty, Thomas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Bailey v. City of Bellevue, Nebraska | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: City of Bellevue, Nebraska | |
| Represented By: | Patrick J. Sullivan |
| Represented By: | Travis M. Jacott |
| Represented By: | Molly J. Miller |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Robert Bailey | |
| Represented By: | Thomas P. McCarty |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
