Brock v. The City of Ord, Nebraska et al
Plaintiff: Guy Brock
Defendant: Heather Sikyta, The City of Ord, Nebraska and Dan Petska
Case Number: 4:2021cv03085
Filed: April 27, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of Nebraska
Presiding Judge: Cheryl R Zwart
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 17, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 14, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 16 TEXT ORDER amending (Filing No. 15): Due to a clerical error, the consent deadline was incorrectly set by the court. The deadline for the parties to consent to disposition by magistrate is amended to June 28, 2021. If the parties consent to final disposition of the case by the undersigned magistrate judge, on or before June 28, 2021, they shall complete the CONSENT TO RANDOM ASSIGNMENT TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE located on the court's website at http://www.ned.uscourts.gov/forms/. After all parties have signed this form, e-mail it in.pdf format to clerk@ned.uscourts.gov. Do not electronically file this form or submit it to chambers. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (JLK)
June 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER - Consent Deadline set for 7/28/2021. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (LKO)
June 9, 2021 Filing 14 BRIEF in support of MOTION to Dismiss #13 by Attorney Matthew B. Reilly on behalf of Defendants Dan Petska, Heather Sikyta, The City of Ord, Nebraska.(Reilly, Matthew)
June 9, 2021 Filing 13 MOTION to Dismiss by Attorney Matthew B. Reilly on behalf of Defendants Dan Petska, Heather Sikyta, The City of Ord, Nebraska.(Reilly, Matthew)
May 25, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 12 TEXT ORDER granting #11 Defendants' Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File a Responsive Pleading. Defendants shall file an answer or other responsive pleading on or before June 9, 2021. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (CEW)
May 25, 2021 Filing 11 UNOPPOSED MOTION for Extension of Time to File a Responsive Pleading by Attorney Matthew B. Reilly on behalf of Defendants Dan Petska, Heather Sikyta, The City of Ord, Nebraska.(Reilly, Matthew)
May 19, 2021 Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed upon defendant Heather Sikyta on 5/12/2021. (Garbison, Jacob)
May 10, 2021 Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed upon defendant Dan Petska on 5/5/2021. (Garbison, Jacob)
May 10, 2021 Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed upon defendant The City of Ord, Nebraska on 5/5/2021. (Garbison, Jacob)
April 30, 2021 Filing 7 Summons Issued as to defendants Dan Petska, Heather Sikyta. YOU MUST PRINT YOUR ISSUED SUMMONS, WHICH ARE ATTACHED TO THIS DOCUMENT. PAPER COPIES WILL NOT BE MAILED. (TCL)
April 28, 2021 Filing 6 Summons Issued as to defendant The City of Ord, Nebraska. YOU MUST PRINT YOUR ISSUED SUMMONS, WHICH ARE ATTACHED TO THIS DOCUMENT. PAPER COPIES WILL NOT BE MAILED. (LKO) Modified on 5/2/2021 to reflect correct defendant summons was issued for (LKO).
April 28, 2021 Filing 5 Summons Requested as to Heather Sikyta regarding Complaint #1 . (Spray, John)
April 28, 2021 Filing 4 Summons Requested as to Dan Petska regarding Complaint #1 . (Spray, John)
April 28, 2021 Filing 3 Summons Requested as to The City of Ord, Nebraska regarding Complaint #1 . (Spray, John)
April 28, 2021 Filing 2 TEXT NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNED: Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart assigned. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(c)(2), the parties are notified that, if all parties consent, a magistrate judge may conduct a civil action or proceeding, including a jury or nonjury trial, subject to the courts rules and policies governing the assignment of judges in civil cases. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 73; NEGenR 1.4. (LRM)
April 27, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANEDC-4387559), by Attorney John L. Spray on behalf of Guy Brock (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Spray, John)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Brock v. The City of Ord, Nebraska et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Heather Sikyta
Represented By: Thomas J. Culhane
Represented By: Matthew B. Reilly
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The City of Ord, Nebraska
Represented By: Thomas J. Culhane
Represented By: Matthew B. Reilly
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dan Petska
Represented By: Thomas J. Culhane
Represented By: Matthew B. Reilly
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Guy Brock
Represented By: Jacob C. Garbison, I
Represented By: John L. Spray
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?