Rivas v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
| Jose Rivas |
| Union Pacific Railroad Company |
| 4:2022cv03160 |
| August 5, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| Susan M Bazis |
| John M Gerrard |
| Federal Employer's Liability |
| 45 U.S.C. ยง 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 29, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
FINAL PROGRESSION ORDER - Depositions due May 19, 2023. Status Conference set for 3/9/2023 at 03:00 PM by Telephone before Magistrate Judge Susan M. Bazis. Counsel shall use the conferencing instructions assigned to this case to participate in the conference. (Filing No. #7 .)Ordered by Magistrate Judge Susan M. Bazis. (MKR)
|
| Filing 9 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting by Attorney James L. Cox, Jr. on behalf of Plaintiff Jose Rivas.(Cox, James) |
|
Filing 8
SCHEDULING ORDER - Rule 26 Meeting Report Deadline set for 10/7/2022.Ordered by Magistrate Judge Susan M. Bazis. (TCL)
|
|
Filing 7
RESTRICTED TELEPHONE CONFERENCE INSTRUCTIONS AND ORDER. ACCESS TO THE PDF DOCUMENT IS RESTRICTED TO CASE PARTICIPANTS AND THE COURT PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 5.2(e). Ordered by Magistrate Judge Susan M. Bazis. (RMW)
|
| Filing 6 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1 of Union Pacific Railroad Company by Attorney Reha Dallon on behalf of Defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company.(Dallon, Reha) |
| Filing 5 Union Pacific Railroad Company's ANSWER to Complaint with with jury demand and Affirmative Defenses by Union Pacific Railroad Company (Dallon, Reha) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company. YOU MUST PRINT YOUR ISSUED SUMMONS, WHICH IS ATTACHED TO THIS DOCUMENT. PAPER COPIES WILL NOT BE MAILED. (JES) |
| Filing 3 TEXT NOTICE OF JUDGES ASSIGNED: Judge John M. Gerrard and Magistrate Judge Susan M. Bazis assigned. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(c)(2), the parties are notified that, if all parties consent, a magistrate judge may conduct a civil action or proceeding, including a jury or nonjury trial, subject to the courts rules and policies governing the assignment of judges in civil cases. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 73; NEGenR 1.4. (JES) |
| Filing 2 Summons Requested as to Defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company regarding Complaint #1 . (Cox, James) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against Union Pacific Railroad Company ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number BNEDC-4686661), by Attorney James L. Cox, Jr. on behalf of Jose Rivas(Cox, James) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Rivas v. Union Pacific Railroad Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Jose Rivas | |
| Represented By: | James L. Cox, Jr. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Union Pacific Railroad Company | |
| Represented By: | Reha Dallon |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
