State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. United States of America
| State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company |
| United States of America |
| 4:2023cv03023 |
| February 24, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| Cheryl R Zwart |
| Personal Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 16, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed upon (Amended Proof of Service) defendant United States of America on 3/6/2023. (Storz, Christopher) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of regarding Complaint #1 , Summons Requested #3 , Summons Requested #4 MAILING TO USPS by Attorney Christopher R. Storz on behalf of Plaintiff State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (Storz, Christopher) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed upon U.S. Attorney for the District of Nebraska - defendant United States of America on 3/1/2023. (Storz, Christopher) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed upon Attorney General of the defendant United States of America on 3/6/2023. (Storz, Christopher) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to defendant United States of America, U.S. Attorney's Office and U.S. Attorney General. YOU MUST PRINT YOUR ISSUED SUMMONS, WHICH ARE ATTACHED TO THIS DOCUMENT. PAPER COPIES WILL NOT BE MAILED. (JES) |
| Filing 5 TEXT NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNED: Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart assigned. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(c)(2), the parties are notified that, if all parties consent, a magistrate judge may conduct a civil action or proceeding, including a jury or nonjury trial, subject to the courts rules and policies governing the assignment of judges in civil cases. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 73; NEGenR 1.4. (JES) |
| Filing 4 Summons Requested as to regarding Corporate Disclosure Statement #2 , Complaint #1 . (Storz, Christopher) |
| Filing 3 Summons Requested as to regarding Corporate Disclosure Statement #2 , Complaint #1 . (Storz, Christopher) |
| Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1 by Attorney Christopher R. Storz on behalf of Plaintiff State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company.(Storz, Christopher) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANEDC-4810542), by Attorney Christopher R. Storz on behalf of State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company(Storz, Christopher) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. United States of America | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company | |
| Represented By: | Christopher R. Storz |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: United States of America | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
