United States of America v. Lincoln Public Schools
| United States of America |
| Lincoln Public Schools |
| 4:2024cv03141 |
| August 15, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| Jacqueline M DeLuca |
| Robert F Rossiter |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12131 Americans with Disabilities Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 11, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
CONSENT DECREE (Attachments: #1 Attachment A) Ordered by Chief Judge Robert F. Rossiter, Jr. (JSF)
|
|
Filing 8
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that the parties' Joint Motion for Entry of Consent Decree (Filing No. #3 ) is granted. The parties' Consent Decree will be entered separately. This matter will be closed for statistical purposes. The Court will retain jurisdiction of this action for three years after the entry of the Consent Decree to the extent necessary to enforce compliance with its terms. Ordered by Chief Judge Robert F. Rossiter, Jr. (JSF)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance of Counsel by Attorney Gregory H. Perry on behalf of Defendant Lincoln Public Schools (Perry, Gregory) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance of Counsel by Attorney Haleigh B. Carlson on behalf of Defendant Lincoln Public Schools (Carlson, Haleigh) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to defendant Lincoln Public Schools. YOU MUST PRINT YOUR ISSUED SUMMONS, WHICH ARE ATTACHED TO THIS DOCUMENT. PAPER COPIES WILL NOT BE MAILED. (JES) |
| Filing 4 TEXT NOTICE OF JUDGES ASSIGNED: Chief Judge Robert F. Rossiter, Jr. and Magistrate Judge Jacqueline M. DeLuca assigned. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(c)(2), the parties are notified that, if all parties consent, a magistrate judge may conduct a civil action or proceeding, including a jury or nonjury trial, subject to the courts rules and policies governing the assignment of judges in civil cases. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 73; NEGenR 1.4. (JES) |
| Filing 3 JOINT MOTION FOR ENTRY OF CONSENT DECREE Proposed Consent Decree by Attorney Charlotte S. Lanvers on behalf of Plaintiff United States of America (Attachments: #1 Proposed Consent Decree, #2 Exhibit A)(Lanvers, Charlotte) Modified on 8/19/2024 to change the event to a motion (LRM). |
| Filing 2 Summons Requested as to Defendant regarding Complaint #1 . (Lanvers, Charlotte) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Lincoln Public Schools, by Attorney Charlotte S. Lanvers on behalf of United States of America(Lanvers, Charlotte) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: United States of America v. Lincoln Public Schools | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: United States of America | |
| Represented By: | Charlotte S. Lanvers |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Lincoln Public Schools | |
| Represented By: | Haleigh B. Carlson |
| Represented By: | Gregory H. Perry |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
