Simonds v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.
| Amy Simonds |
| Union Pacific Railroad Co. |
| 4:2024cv03159 |
| September 5, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| Susan M Bazis |
| Jacqueline M DeLuca |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 1, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 TEXT ORDER: The parties did not consent, in writing, to disposition of the case by a magistrate judge. Pursuant to NEGenR.1.4(a)(3)(C)(ii). Case reassigned to Judge Susan M. Bazis and Magistrate Judge Jacqueline M. DeLuca. Ordered by Deputy Clerk. (JES) |
| Filing 9 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting by Attorney Scott P. Moore on behalf of Defendant Union Pacific Railroad Co..(Moore, Scott) |
Filing 8
CASE CONFERENCE INSTRUCTIONS - WebEx. ACCESS TO THE PDF DOCUMENT IS RESTRICTED TO CASE PARTICIPANTS AND THE COURT PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 5.2(e). Ordered by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline M. DeLuca. (TCL)
|
|
Filing 7
SCHEDULING ORDER - Rule 26 Meeting Report Deadline set for 11/1/2024. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline M. DeLuca. (TCL)
|
| Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint with with jury demand by Union Pacific Railroad Co. (McCauley, Addison) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed upon defendant Union Pacific Railroad Co. on 9/13/2024. (Thompson, Nicholas) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to defendant Union Pacific Railroad Co. YOU MUST PRINT YOUR ISSUED SUMMONS, WHICH ARE ATTACHED TO THIS DOCUMENT. PAPER COPIES WILL NOT BE MAILED. (LRM) |
| Filing 3 TEXT NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNED: Magistrate Judge Jacqueline M. DeLuca assigned. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(c)(2), the parties are notified that, if all parties consent, a magistrate judge may conduct a civil action or proceeding, including a jury or nonjury trial, subject to the courts rules and policies governing the assignment of judges in civil cases. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 73; NEGenR 1.4. (LRM) |
| Filing 2 Summons Requested as to regarding Complaint #1 . (Thompson, Nicholas) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against Union Pacific Railroad Co. ( Filing fee $ 405, receipt number ANEDC-5157662), by Attorney Nicholas D. Thompson on behalf of Amy Simonds (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Thompson, Nicholas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Simonds v. Union Pacific Railroad Co. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Union Pacific Railroad Co. | |
| Represented By: | Scott P. Moore |
| Represented By: | Addison C. McCauley |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Amy Simonds | |
| Represented By: | Nicholas D. Thompson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
