Figuero et al v. Tyson Foods
| 8:2006cv00748 |
| December 8, 2006 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| 8 Omaha Office |
| Joseph F. Bataillon |
| Thomas D. Thalken |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex) |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
86
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 80 Motion for Attorney Fees and Expenses. Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(JAE)
|
|
Filing
82
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - This matter is dismissed without prejudice because Plaintiff failed to prosecute this matter diligently and failed to comply with this court's orders. A separate judgment will be entered in accordance with this Memorandum and Order. Plaintiff is reminded that he has until January 29, 2009 to file a response to the pending Motion for Attorney Fees. Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(JAE, )
|
|
Filing
79
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Defendant shall have until December 29, 2008 to file an application for attorney's fees and expenses caused by Plaintiff's failure to attend his deposition, and Plaintiff shall have until January 29, 2009 to file a re sponse. Plaintiff shall have until December 29, 2008 to show cause why this action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute this matter diligently. Further proceedings, with the exception of the resolution of any application for attorney 9;s fees and expenses, shall be stayed until Plaintiff shows cause why this action should not be dismissed or until the deadline for him to comply with the show cause order passes. Defendant's Motion for Sanctions 68 is granted in part in acco rdance with this Memorandum and Order. The Clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this matter with the following text: December 29, 2008: check for application for fees and response to show cause and dismiss if none filed. Defendant's Motion to Suspend Scheduling Order 71 is granted. All previous deadlines are stayed until further order of the court. Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(JAE, )
|
|
Filing
64
ORDER - The Joint Stipulation for Plaintiff's Attorney to Withdraw 60 isadopted. Vincent M. Ekeh is granted leave to withdraw. The Clerk of Court shall stop all electronic notice of this case to Mr. Ekeh. The plaintiff is hereby considered pr oceeding pro se and counsel for the defendant may communicate with the plaintiff directly regarding this case. The Clerk of Court shall reassign this case to the pro se docket in accordancewith General Order No. 2007-13.The Clerk of Court shall send a copy of this order to the plaintiff at his last known address: Ignacio Figeroa,1309 Logan Street, Norfolk, NE 68701. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (Copy mailed to pro se party as directed)(JAE, )
|
|
Filing
38
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE that the parties shall report to the court in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) on or before February 19, 2008 or show cause why sanctions should not be imposed upon them in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(f) and 37(g). Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (ADB)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Figuero et al v. Tyson Foods | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
