Diamantopoulos v. State of Nebraska et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|October 14, 2008
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that Plaintiff's claims against Defendants are dismissed in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2.); denying as moot 89 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying as moot 92 Motion ; denying as moot 93 Motion ; denying as moot 94 Motion for Summary Judgment ; A separate judgment will be entered in accordance with this Memorandum and Order. The Clerk of the court is directed to place the 28USC1915(g)_STR flag on this matter. Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(ADB, )
|February 5, 2007
ORDER ON INITIAL REVIEW - The Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis 2 is provisionally granted, subject to receipt of the plaintiff's trust account information, at which time, a separate Prisoner Payment Order will iss ue. The Clerk of Court is directed to provide the plaintiff with one summons and one Form USM-285 and a copy of this order. The plaintiff shall, as soon as possible, send the completed summons and 285 forms back to the Clerk of Court. In the absen ce of the completed forms, service of process cannot occur. The plaintiff shall serve the defendant within 120 days of filing the complaint, otherwise, dismissal can occur. The plaintiff shall keep the court informed of her current address at all times while this case is pending. Failure to do so may result in dismissal. Ordered by Magistrate Judge F. A. Gossett. - (one blank summons and 285 forms sent as directed) (KBJ)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?