Rickert v. Midland Lutheran College et al
Plaintiff: Joan Rickert
Defendant: Midland Lutheran College, Steven Titus, Gene Crume, Steve Schneider and Tara Knudson-Carl
Case Number: 8:2007cv00334
Filed: August 27, 2007
Court: US District Court for the District of Nebraska
Office: 8 Omaha Office
County: Platte
Presiding Judge: Richard G. Kopf
Presiding Judge: Pro Se Docket
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 2, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 78 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - The defendant's motion for summary judgment, (filing no. 58 ), is granted. This case is dismissed in its entirety. Judgment shall be entered by separate document. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (GJG)
June 5, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 62 ORDER granting 61 plaintiff's motion for extension of deadline; the deadline for plaintiff to file a response to defendant's MOTION for Summary Judgment 58 is extended to 7/2/09; defendant's reply brief shall be filed by 7/22/09 - Ordered by Magistrate Judge David L. Piester. (BMH)
April 6, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 57 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER regarding 50 Motion to Compel. Plaintiff has moved to compel responses to her request for production of documents, specifically request 16. The dispute here appears to be well suited to a discussion that would resolve it with out further involvement of the court. I shall rely on counsel to do that, but if it cannot be resolved, to file another motion setting out specifically the items being disputed and the parties' positions with respect to each. IT THEREFORE HEREBY IS ORDERED,The motion to compel, filing no. 50 , is denied. Ordered by Magistrate Judge David L. Piester. (LKH)
March 10, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 53 ORDER - This matter came before the Court on the stipulated motion of the parties, filing no. 52 , seeking to extend the due date for defendant's brief in response to plaintiff's motion to compel certain discovery. The Court finds that the stipulated motion should be granted and defendant's date for filing a brief in response to plaintiff's motion to compel is extended until March 26, 2009. Ordered by Magistrate Judge David L. Piester. (GJG)
March 3, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 49 CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge - upon consent of parties, this case is transferred to Magistrate Judge David L. Piester for final disposition. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (GJG)
February 19, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 44 AMENDED ORDER SETTING FINAL SCHEDULE FOR PROGRESSION OF CASE - The parties' amended joint motion, filing no. 43 , to amend scheduling order is granted. Deposition Deadline set for November 25, 2009. The Final Pretrial Conference with the unde rsigned magistrate judge is set for November 24, 2009 at 10:00 a.m. in chambers, 566 Federal Building and United States Courthouse, Lincoln, Nebraska. Jury trial is set to commence at 9:00 a.m., December 14, 2009 for 3-4 days, in Courtroom 2, United States Courthouse and Federal Building, 100 Centennial Mall North, Lincoln, Nebraska, before the undersigned magistrate judge. Jury selection shall be at the commencement of trial. Ordered by Magistrate Judge David L. Piester. (GJG)
November 24, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 36 ORDER-Defendant's unopposed oral motion to continue is granted and the Rule 16 telephone planning conference is continued from December 30, 2008 to January 6, 2009 at 9:30 a.m. Plaintiffs counsel shall initiate the call. Ordered by Magistrate Judge David L. Piester. (LKL)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rickert v. Midland Lutheran College et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joan Rickert
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Midland Lutheran College
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Steven Titus
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Gene Crume
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Steve Schneider
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tara Knudson-Carl
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?