Finley v. Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway

Plaintiff: George Finley
Defendant: Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway
Case Number: 8:2008cv00181
Filed: April 21, 2008
Court: Nebraska District Court
Office: P.I. : Asbestos Office
County: Lancaster
Presiding Judge: Lyle E. Strom
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 45:51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
June 2, 2009 20 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER - Transfer Order from MDL 875 that all cases from the District of Nebraska shall be transferred to the Eastern District of Pennsylvania in accordance with the Court's Administrative Order. (Attachments: # 1 Administrative Order, # 2 Letter)Ordered by Eduardo C. Robreno. (TCL)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Finley v. Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: George Finley
Represented By: Robert L. Norton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway
Represented By: Thomas C. Sattler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.