Maehr v. Internal Revenue Service

Maehr v. Internal Revenue Service

Defendant:	Internal Revenue Service
Petitioner:	Jeffrey T. Maehr
Case Number:	8:2008cv00213
Filed:	May 15, 2008
Court:	US District Court for the District of Nebraska
Office:	Other Statutory Actions Office
County:	Douglas
Presiding Judge:	Pro Se Docket
Presiding Judge:	Laurie Smith Camp
Nature of Suit:	None
Cause of Action:	U.S. Government Defendant
Jury Demanded By:	26:7609 IRS: Petition to Quash IRS Summons

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
January 9, 2009	Filing 9 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Maehr's Amended Petition to Quash Summons (Filing No. 17 in case 8:08CV190) is permitted to proceed and supersedes the previous Motion to Quash 1 . The Clerk of the court is directed to terminate Filing No. 1 in Case No. 8:08CV190. Case Nos. 8:08CV213 and 8:08CV214 are dismissed without prejudice. All pending Motions in these two matters are denied as moot. Separate judgments will be entered in accordance with this Memorandum and Order. Maehr is relieved from pa yment of the remainder of the filing fee in Case Nos. 8:08CV213 and 8:08CV214. Maehr must pay the remainder of the filing fee in Case No. 8:08CV190, or alternatively, must submit a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and an affidavit in su pport no later than February 9, 2009. In the event that Maehr fails to pay the remainder of the filing fee in Case No. 8:08CV190 or fails to submit a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and an affidavit in support by February 9, 2009, Case No. 8:08CV190 will be dismissed for failure to pay the filing fee. However, Maehr will remain responsible for payment of the entire $350.00 filing fee in Case No. 8:08CV190 regardless of dismissal. The Clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in Case No. 8:08CV190 with the following text: February 9, 2009: deadline for Maehr to pay balance of fee or file IFP motions. Maehr's Motions for Clarification 8 (Case No. 8:08CV214, Filing No. 8, Case No. 08CV190, Filing No. 16) are denied. Ordered by Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (KBJ) Modified on 1/12/2009 to edit text (KBJ).
November 25, 2008	Filing 7 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Maehr's Motion for Reconsideration and to Consolidate Cases 6 in Case No. 8:08cv213; (Case No. 8:08CV190, Filing No. 14; 8:08CV214, Filing No. 6) is denied in part and granted in part. To the extent it remains pending, Maehr's Motion for Reconsideration (Case No. 8:08CV190, Filing No. 7) is denied. Maehr is permitted to consolidate these matters. No later than December 31, 2008, Maehr shall file an amended petition in Case No. 8:08CV190 as set forth in this Order. If he files an amended petition, Maehr must pay the remainder of the filing fee in Case No. 8:08CV190, or alternatively, must submit a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and an affidavit in support. In the event that Maehr fails t o file an amended petition by December 31, 2008, all three of these cases will be dismissed for failure to pay the filing fee. However, Maehr will remain responsible for payment of the entire $350.00 filing fee in all three cases regardless of dismissal. The Clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this case with the following text: December 31, 2008: deadline for Maehr to pay balance of fee or file IFP motions and consolidate cases. Maehr's request for recusal of the undersigned judge is denied; and Maehr's Motion for Administrative Default Ruling (Case No. 8:08CV214, Filing No. 4) is denied. Ordered by Judge Laurie Smith Camp.(Copy mailed to pro se party)(KBJ)

Date Filed

Document Text

January 9, 2009

Filing 9 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Maehr's Amended Petition to Quash Summons (Filing No. 17 in case 8:08CV190) is permitted to proceed and supersedes the previous Motion to Quash 1 . The Clerk of the court is directed to terminate Filing No. 1 in Case No. 8:08CV190. Case Nos. 8:08CV213 and 8:08CV214 are dismissed without prejudice. All pending Motions in these two matters are denied as moot. Separate judgments will be entered in accordance with this Memorandum and Order. Maehr is relieved from pa yment of the remainder of the filing fee in Case Nos. 8:08CV213 and 8:08CV214. Maehr must pay the remainder of the filing fee in Case No. 8:08CV190, or alternatively, must submit a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and an affidavit in su pport no later than February 9, 2009. In the event that Maehr fails to pay the remainder of the filing fee in Case No. 8:08CV190 or fails to submit a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and an affidavit in support by February 9, 2009, Case No. 8:08CV190 will be dismissed for failure to pay the filing fee. However, Maehr will remain responsible for payment of the entire $350.00 filing fee in Case No. 8:08CV190 regardless of dismissal. The Clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in Case No. 8:08CV190 with the following text: February 9, 2009: deadline for Maehr to pay balance of fee or file IFP motions. Maehr's Motions for Clarification 8 (Case No. 8:08CV214, Filing No. 8, Case No. 08CV190, Filing No. 16) are denied. Ordered by Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (KBJ) Modified on 1/12/2009 to edit text (KBJ).

November 25, 2008

Filing 7 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Maehr's Motion for Reconsideration and to Consolidate Cases 6 in Case No. 8:08cv213; (Case No. 8:08CV190, Filing No. 14; 8:08CV214, Filing No. 6) is denied in part and granted in part. To the extent it remains pending, Maehr's Motion for Reconsideration (Case No. 8:08CV190, Filing No. 7) is denied. Maehr is permitted to consolidate these matters. No later than December 31, 2008, Maehr shall file an amended petition in Case No. 8:08CV190 as set forth in this Order. If he files an amended petition, Maehr must pay the remainder of the filing fee in Case No. 8:08CV190, or alternatively, must submit a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and an affidavit in support. In the event that Maehr fails t o file an amended petition by December 31, 2008, all three of these cases will be dismissed for failure to pay the filing fee. However, Maehr will remain responsible for payment of the entire $350.00 filing fee in all three cases regardless of dismissal. The Clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this case with the following text: December 31, 2008: deadline for Maehr to pay balance of fee or file IFP motions and consolidate cases. Maehr's request for recusal of the undersigned judge is denied; and Maehr's Motion for Administrative Default Ruling (Case No. 8:08CV214, Filing No. 4) is denied. Ordered by Judge Laurie Smith Camp.(Copy mailed to pro se party)(KBJ)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Maehr v. Internal Revenue Service
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Jeffrey T. Maehr
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Internal Revenue Service
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?